"We are in the Congo now" : Sweden and the trinity of peacekeeping during the Congo crisis 1960-1964
Research output: Thesis › Doctoral Thesis (monograph)
The study demonstrates how the decision to participate, when urged by the UN in 1960, was, more or less, an unanimous decision in Sweden. Several aspects, well rooted in the Swedish self-perception in the 1960s, contributed to the decision. Above all Sweden was considered particularly well suited for the peacekeeping duty. This emanated from a notion of Sweden as a well functioning society, built on consensus and without a ‘colonial baggage’ or open political affiliations in the Cold War. Furthermore, in the UN Sweden saw a way to forward the nation’s political interests, particularly the notion of neutrality. Hence, confidence in the UN was considerable and support to the organisation’s goals was often formulated in terms of ‘duty’.
The ONUC, however, soon turned out to be a very confusing and violent mission. In 1961 and 1962 Swedish battalions became directly involved in military confrontations and Swedish soldiers both killed and were killed in the Congo. At the same time influential parts of the world opinion, especially in Belgium, Great Britain and France, accused the UN of unjust and illegitimate behaviour in the Congo. The study shows that the events in the Congo tested the former pre-understanding in Sweden of what peacekeeping was, or ought to be, and thus challenged the domestic support for Swedish participation. Hence, the events in the Congo tested the stability of the analytic trinity. Dichotomies such as war–peace, national–international and military–civilian were given different meanings as they were described and discussed by the different nodes in the trinity.
In the end, the trinity held together much due to political consensus in Sweden and by the fact that the UN in 1963 prevailed in the military struggle in the Congo. This did not bring an end to the political chaos in the Congo but it created a window of opportunities for the UN and Sweden to withdraw in 1964, claiming that the mandate had been fulfilled.
|Research areas and keywords||
Subject classification (UKÄ) – MANDATORY
Thomas Gammeltoft, Anna Nilsson, Annamaria Westregård, Christoffer Wong, Birgitta Nyström, Eleni Karageorgiou, Erin Kennedy, Joachim Östlund, Ilhami Alkan Olsson, Karol Nowak, Lena Halldenius, Letizia Lo Giacco, Markus Gunneflo, Matthias Abelin, Matthew Scott, Mark Gibney, Dan-Erik Andersson, Olof Beckman, Vladislava Stoyanova, Marina Svensson, Magdalena Bexell, Catarina Kinnvall, Johanna Alkan Olsson, Ulf Johansson Dahre, Sahar Valizadeh, Alejandro Fuentes, Radu Mares, Vincenzo Pietrogiovanni, Ni Wanying, Michael Bogdan, David Alm, Håkan Hydén, Morten Kjaerum, Martha Frances Davis, Mia Rönnmar, Rolf Ring, Reza Banakar, Vilhelm Persson, Xavier Groussot, Anette Agardh, Karin Aggestam, Annika Bergman Rosamond, Håkan Johansson, Ida Jansson, Malin Arvidsson, Sara Kalm, Andrea Karlsson, Frida Nilsson, Amin Parsa, Rouzbeh Parsi, Lotti Ryberg Welander, Niklas Selberg, Vladislava Stoyanova, Lina Sturfelt, Emma Sundkvist, Ted Svensson, Karl Adam Tiderman, Andreas Tullberg, Anders Uhlin & Karin Hongsaton Zackari
2016/06/15 → …