Abstract
1. Formal arguments against full 1:st person knowledge of motivation. 2. Empirical evidence against 1:st person knowledge of motivation. 3. Sensitivity to background factors. 4. Individuation of options. 5. Charitable or paternalistic interpretation. 6. The role of self-diagnosis in deliberation. 7. Conclusions
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Preprint without journal information |
| Publication status | Unpublished - 2001 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Philosophy