Abstract
The entrepreneurial ecosystem (EE) literature has attracted much attention, especially in policy circles. However, the concept suffers from a number of shortcomings: (1) it lacks a clear analytical framework that makes explicit what is cause and what is effect in an EE; (2) while being a systemic concept, the EE has not yet fully exploited insights from network theory, and it is not always clear in what way the proposed elements are connected in an EE; (3) it remains a challenge what institutions (and at what spatial scale) impact on the structure and performance of EE; (4) studies have often focused on the EE in single regions or clusters, but lack a comparative and multi-scalar perspective and (5) the EE literature tends to provide a static framework taking a snapshot of EE without considering systematically their evolution over time. For each of these shortcomings, we make a number of suggestions to take up in future research on EE.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 887-903 |
| Journal | European Planning Studies |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 2017 Mar 15 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 Jun 3 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Economic Geography
Free keywords
- clusters
- Entrepreneurial ecosystem
- entrepreneurial system
- entrepreneurship
- networks
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Doctoral Thesis (compilation)
-
Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in Life Science Industry: A study of start-ups, scale ups and resilience of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems
Alvedalen, J., 2021 Jan 18, Lund University, CIRCLE - Center for Innovation, Research and Competences in the Learning Economy. 220 p.Research output: Thesis › Doctoral Thesis (compilation)
File
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver