TY - JOUR
T1 - A pilot study of an organised population‐based testing programme for prostate cancer
AU - Alterbeck, Max
AU - Thimansson, Erik
AU - Bengtsson, Johan
AU - Baubeta, Erik
AU - Zackrisson, Sophia
AU - Bolejko, Anetta
AU - Sandeman, Kevin
AU - Carlsson, Sigrid
AU - Jiborn, Thomas
AU - Bjartell, Anders
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - ObjectiveTo determine the feasibility of a digitally automated population-based programme for organised prostate cancer testing (OPT) in Southern Sweden.Patients and MethodsA pilot project for a regional OPT was conducted between September 2020 and February 2021, inviting 999 randomly selected men aged 50, 56, or 62 years (y). Risk stratification was based on PSA, PSA density (PSAD), and biparametric prostate MRI. Men with a PSA level of 3–99 ng/mL had an MRI, and men with elevated PSA (≥ 3 ng/mL) had a urological check-up, including a DRE and TRUS. Indications for targeted and/or systematic transrectal prostate biopsies were suspicious lesions on MRI (prostate imaging reporting and data system [PI-RADS] 4–5) and/or PSAD > 0.15 ng/mL/cm3. Additional indications for prostate biopsies were palpable tumours, PSA ratio ResultsA total of 418 men had a PSA test (42%), with increasing participation rates by age (50y, 38%; 56y, 44%; and 62y, 45%). Among these, 35 men (8%) had elevated PSA (≥ 3 ng/mL: 50y, 1/139; 56y, 10/143; and 62y, 24/146). On MRI, 16 men (48%) had a negative scan (PI-RADS 0.15 ng/mL/cm3 or a suspicious finding on TRUS. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in ten men. Six men underwent active treatment, whereas four men were assigned to active surveillance.ConclusionOur OPT model is feasible from an operational point of view, but due to the limited scale of this study no conclusions can be made regarding the efficacy of the diagnostic model or outcome
AB - ObjectiveTo determine the feasibility of a digitally automated population-based programme for organised prostate cancer testing (OPT) in Southern Sweden.Patients and MethodsA pilot project for a regional OPT was conducted between September 2020 and February 2021, inviting 999 randomly selected men aged 50, 56, or 62 years (y). Risk stratification was based on PSA, PSA density (PSAD), and biparametric prostate MRI. Men with a PSA level of 3–99 ng/mL had an MRI, and men with elevated PSA (≥ 3 ng/mL) had a urological check-up, including a DRE and TRUS. Indications for targeted and/or systematic transrectal prostate biopsies were suspicious lesions on MRI (prostate imaging reporting and data system [PI-RADS] 4–5) and/or PSAD > 0.15 ng/mL/cm3. Additional indications for prostate biopsies were palpable tumours, PSA ratio ResultsA total of 418 men had a PSA test (42%), with increasing participation rates by age (50y, 38%; 56y, 44%; and 62y, 45%). Among these, 35 men (8%) had elevated PSA (≥ 3 ng/mL: 50y, 1/139; 56y, 10/143; and 62y, 24/146). On MRI, 16 men (48%) had a negative scan (PI-RADS 0.15 ng/mL/cm3 or a suspicious finding on TRUS. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in ten men. Six men underwent active treatment, whereas four men were assigned to active surveillance.ConclusionOur OPT model is feasible from an operational point of view, but due to the limited scale of this study no conclusions can be made regarding the efficacy of the diagnostic model or outcome
U2 - 10.1111/bju.16143
DO - 10.1111/bju.16143
M3 - Article
C2 - 37523331
SN - 1464-4096
VL - 133
SP - 87
EP - 95
JO - BJU International
JF - BJU International
IS - 1
ER -