A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain

R. Carter Clement, Adina Welander, Caleb Stowell, Thomas D. Cha, John L. Chen, Michelle Davies, Jeremy C. Fairbank, Kevin T. Foley, Martin Gehrchen, Olle Hagg, Wilco C. Jacobs, Richard Kahler, Safdar N. Khan, Isador H. Lieberman, Beth Morisson, Donna D. Ohnmeiss, Wilco C. Peul, Neal H. Shonnard, Matthew W. Smuck, Tore K. SolbergBjörn Strömqvist, Miranda L. Van Hooff, Ajay D. Wasan, Paul C. Willems, William Yeo, Peter FRitzell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

97 Citations (SciVal)
180 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and purpose - Outcome measurement has been shown to improve performance in several fields of healthcare. This understanding has driven a growing interest in value-based healthcare, where value is defined as outcomes achieved per money spent. While low back pain (LBP) constitutes an enormous burden of disease, no universal set of metrics has yet been accepted to measure and compare outcomes. Here, we aim to define such a set. Patients and methods - An international group of 22 specialists in several disciplines of spine care was assembled to review literature and select LBP outcome metrics through a 6-round modified Delphi process. The scope of the outcome set was degenerative lumbar conditions. Results - Patient-reported metrics include numerical pain scales, lumbar-related function using the Oswestry disability index, health-related quality of life using the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, and questions assessing work status and analgesic use. Specific common and serious complications are included. Recommended follow-up intervals include 6, 12, and 24 months after initiating treatment, with optional follow-up at 3 months and 5 years. Metrics for risk stratification are selected based on preexisting tools. Interpretation - The outcome measures recommended here are structured around specific etiologies of LBP, span a patient's entire cycle of care, and allow for risk adjustment. Thus, when implemented, this set can be expected to facilitate meaningful comparisons and ultimately provide a continuous feedback loop, enabling ongoing improvements in quality of care. Much work lies ahead in implementation, revision, and validation of this set, but it is an essential first step toward establishing a community of LBP providers focused on maximizing the value of the care we deliver.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)523-533
JournalActa Orthopaedica
Volume86
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Orthopedics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A proposed set of metrics for standardized outcome reporting in the management of low back pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this