A Reply to “Comment on ‘A Literature Meta-Analysis of The Effects of Lockdowns on Covid-19 Mortality’”

Jonas Herby, Lars Jonung, Steve H. Hanke

Research output: Working paper/PreprintWorking paper

125 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In our meta-study from 2022, “A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Lockdowns on COVID-19 Mortality – II,” we find that the effect of lockdowns—also referred to as ‘Covid restrictions,’ ‘social distancing measures,’ etc.—on mortality was negligible. The first version of our meta-study received criticism from Banholzer, et al. (2022). The authors raised “concerns regarding the subject and conduct” of our meta-analysis. In this reply we respond to these objections. We demonstrate that the criticism brought forward by Banholzer et al. (2022) lacks a solid foundation, focuses at best on ancillary issues, and generally misses the entire point of our research. In short, Banholzer, et al.’s comments are immaterial and irrelevant.
Original languageEnglish
Pages1-12
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Publication series

NameStudies in Applied Economics
PublisherThe Johns Hopkins Institute for Applied Economics, Global Health, and the Study of Business Enterprise
No.SAE 2023:237

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Economics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Reply to “Comment on ‘A Literature Meta-Analysis of The Effects of Lockdowns on Covid-19 Mortality’”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this