A secure procedure for early career scientists to report apparent misconduct

Baruch Fischhoff, Barry Dewitt, Nils Eric Sahlin, Alex Davis

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Early career scientists sometimes observe senior scientists engage in apparent scientific misconduct, but feel powerless to intervene, lest they imperil their careers. We propose a Secure Reporting Procedure that both protects them, when pursuing those concerns, and treats the senior scientists fairly. The proposed procedure is, we argue, consistent with the ethical principles of the scientific community, as expressed in the codes of its professional organizations. However, its implementation will require changes in procedures and regulations. Those efforts will be a small price to pay for protecting the scientific community’s integrity and fidelity to its principles. We begin by describing the circumstances motivating the proposal, then sketch its design, and, finally, illustrate next steps in its application in two national settings.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2
JournalLife Sciences, Society and Policy
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified

Free keywords

  • Institutional design
  • Policymaking
  • Research integrity
  • Scientific practice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A secure procedure for early career scientists to report apparent misconduct'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this