TY - JOUR
T1 - Adding Defibrillation Therapy to Cardiac Resynchronization on the Basis of the Myocardial Substrate
AU - Barra, Sérgio
AU - Boveda, Serge
AU - Providência, Rui
AU - Sadoul, Nicolas
AU - Duehmke, Rudolf
AU - Reitan, Christian
AU - Borgquist, Rasmus
AU - Narayanan, Kumar
AU - Hidden-Lucet, Françoise
AU - Klug, Didier
AU - Defaye, Pascal
AU - Gras, Daniel
AU - Anselme, Frédéric
AU - Leclercq, Christophe
AU - Hermida, Jean-Sébastien
AU - Deharo, Jean Claude
AU - Looi, Khang Li
AU - Chow, Anthony W.
AU - Virdee, Munmohan
AU - Fynn, Simon
AU - Le Heuzey, Jean-Yves
AU - Marijon, Eloi
AU - Agarwal, Sharad
AU - French-UK-Sweden CRT Network
N1 - Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/4/4
Y1 - 2017/4/4
N2 - BACKGROUND: Patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) may be at lower risk for ventricular arrhythmias compared with those with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). In addition, DCM has been identified as a predictor of positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of an additional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator over CRT, according to underlying heart disease, in a large study group of primary prevention patients with heart failure.METHODS: This was an observational, multicenter, European cohort study of 5,307 consecutive patients with DCM or ICM, no history of sustained ventricular arrhythmias, who underwent CRT implantation with (n = 4,037) or without (n = 1,270) a defibrillator. Propensity-score and cause-of-death analyses were used to compare outcomes.RESULTS: After a mean follow-up period of 41.4 ± 29.0 months, patients with ICM had better survival when receiving CRT with a defibrillator compared with those who received CRT without a defibrillator (hazard ratio for mortality adjusted on propensity score and all mortality predictors: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62 to 0.92; p = 0.005), whereas in patients with DCM, no such difference was observed (hazard ratio: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.16; p = 0.49). Compared with recipients of defibrillators, the excess mortality in patients who did not receive defibrillators was related to sudden cardiac death in 8.0% among those with ICM but in only 0.4% of those with DCM.CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with heart failure with indications for CRT, those with DCM may not benefit from additional primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy, as opposed to those with ICM.
AB - BACKGROUND: Patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) may be at lower risk for ventricular arrhythmias compared with those with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). In addition, DCM has been identified as a predictor of positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of an additional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator over CRT, according to underlying heart disease, in a large study group of primary prevention patients with heart failure.METHODS: This was an observational, multicenter, European cohort study of 5,307 consecutive patients with DCM or ICM, no history of sustained ventricular arrhythmias, who underwent CRT implantation with (n = 4,037) or without (n = 1,270) a defibrillator. Propensity-score and cause-of-death analyses were used to compare outcomes.RESULTS: After a mean follow-up period of 41.4 ± 29.0 months, patients with ICM had better survival when receiving CRT with a defibrillator compared with those who received CRT without a defibrillator (hazard ratio for mortality adjusted on propensity score and all mortality predictors: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62 to 0.92; p = 0.005), whereas in patients with DCM, no such difference was observed (hazard ratio: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.16; p = 0.49). Compared with recipients of defibrillators, the excess mortality in patients who did not receive defibrillators was related to sudden cardiac death in 8.0% among those with ICM but in only 0.4% of those with DCM.CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with heart failure with indications for CRT, those with DCM may not benefit from additional primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy, as opposed to those with ICM.
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.042
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.042
M3 - Article
C2 - 28359511
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 69
SP - 1669
EP - 1678
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 13
ER -