Adding Defibrillation Therapy to Cardiac Resynchronization on the Basis of the Myocardial Substrate

Sérgio Barra, Serge Boveda, Rui Providência, Nicolas Sadoul, Rudolf Duehmke, Christian Reitan, Rasmus Borgquist, Kumar Narayanan, Françoise Hidden-Lucet, Didier Klug, Pascal Defaye, Daniel Gras, Frédéric Anselme, Christophe Leclercq, Jean-Sébastien Hermida, Jean Claude Deharo, Khang Li Looi, Anthony W. Chow, Munmohan Virdee, Simon FynnJean-Yves Le Heuzey, Eloi Marijon, Sharad Agarwal, French-UK-Sweden CRT Network

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) may be at lower risk for ventricular arrhythmias compared with those with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). In addition, DCM has been identified as a predictor of positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of an additional implantable cardioverter-defibrillator over CRT, according to underlying heart disease, in a large study group of primary prevention patients with heart failure.

METHODS: This was an observational, multicenter, European cohort study of 5,307 consecutive patients with DCM or ICM, no history of sustained ventricular arrhythmias, who underwent CRT implantation with (n = 4,037) or without (n = 1,270) a defibrillator. Propensity-score and cause-of-death analyses were used to compare outcomes.

RESULTS: After a mean follow-up period of 41.4 ± 29.0 months, patients with ICM had better survival when receiving CRT with a defibrillator compared with those who received CRT without a defibrillator (hazard ratio for mortality adjusted on propensity score and all mortality predictors: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62 to 0.92; p = 0.005), whereas in patients with DCM, no such difference was observed (hazard ratio: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.16; p = 0.49). Compared with recipients of defibrillators, the excess mortality in patients who did not receive defibrillators was related to sudden cardiac death in 8.0% among those with ICM but in only 0.4% of those with DCM.

CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with heart failure with indications for CRT, those with DCM may not benefit from additional primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy, as opposed to those with ICM.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1669-1678
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume69
Issue number13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Apr 4
Externally publishedYes

Free keywords

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adding Defibrillation Therapy to Cardiac Resynchronization on the Basis of the Myocardial Substrate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this