Addressing the possibility of normative conflicts around human rights: The concept of adaptation

Peter G. Kirchschläger

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This chapter provides the legitimacy of human rights as individual rights of all humans; and the justification of the universality of human rights. It deals with the legitimacy of the impact of the universality of human rights within religious and worldview-based communities. The chapter shows that the patterns of argumentation of different religious and worldview-based communities, or some groups within these communities, against human rights, will be assessed from an ethical perspective. It examines the model of "adaptation" as the way forward in understanding the correlation between religious and worldview-based communities and human rights dialogically in order to address the possibility of normative conflicts in a way which could contribute to the resolving of such conflicts. The status of human rights as individual rights can represent a source of normative conflicts. Human rights ask religious and worldview-based communities to contribute towards their realization – be it in their own context or in other contexts.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNormative Pluralism and Human Rights
Subtitle of host publicationSocial Normativities in Conflict
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter12
Pages237-254
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781315165233
ISBN (Print)9781138056596
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jun 25
Externally publishedYes

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Philosophy, Ethics and Religion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Addressing the possibility of normative conflicts around human rights: The concept of adaptation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this