Abstract
It is estimated that 3-6% of all vasectomised men request vasectomy reversal for different reasons. Microsurgical vasovasostomy is the gold standard technique of vasectomy reversal. However, the microsurgical technique is time-consuming and challenging to most urological surgeons. Therefore, alternative methods of vasal anastomosis have been studied including robotic-assisted vasovasostomy. This review discusses the feasibility and practice of robotic-assisted vasovasostomy. Based on the available studies robotic-assisted vasovasostomy is feasible. The reported rate of vasal patency associated with this new technique is similar to that of microsurgical vasovasostomy. There is no clear difference between the 2 approaches in terms of operating time. Robotic-assisted vasovasostomy does not appear to afford significant advantages in the era of vasectomy reversal.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 113-7 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Current Urology |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Surgery
- Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine
Free keywords
- Journal Article
- Review