Aging is not an Illness: Exploring Geriatricians' Resistance to Serious Illness Conversations

Alexis Drutchas, Deborah S Lee, Sharon Levine, Jeffrey L Greenwald, Juliet Jacobsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

CONTEXT: Serious illness conversations help clinicians align medical decisions with patients' goals, values, and priorities and are considered an essential component of shared decision-making. Yet geriatricians at our institution have expressed reluctance about the serious illness care program.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to explore geriatricians' perspectives on serious illness conversations.

METHODS: We conducted focus groups with interprofessional stakeholders in geriatrics.

RESULTS: Three key themes emerged that help explain the reluctance of clinicians caring for older patients to have or document serious illness conversations: 1) aging in itself is not a serious illness; 2) geriatricians often focus on positive adaptation and social determinants of health and in this context, the label of "serious illness conversations" is perceived as limiting; and 3) because aging is not synonymous with illness, important goals-of-care conversations are not necessarily documented as serious illness conversations until an acute illness presents itself.

CONCLUSION: As institutions work to create system-wide processes for documenting conversations about patients' goals and values, the unique communication preferences of older patients and geriatricians should be specifically considered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e313-e317
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume66
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023 Sept
Externally publishedYes

Free keywords

  • Humans
  • Geriatricians
  • Communication
  • Aging
  • Critical Illness/therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aging is not an Illness: Exploring Geriatricians' Resistance to Serious Illness Conversations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this