Abstract
CONTEXT: Serious illness conversations help clinicians align medical decisions with patients' goals, values, and priorities and are considered an essential component of shared decision-making. Yet geriatricians at our institution have expressed reluctance about the serious illness care program.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to explore geriatricians' perspectives on serious illness conversations.
METHODS: We conducted focus groups with interprofessional stakeholders in geriatrics.
RESULTS: Three key themes emerged that help explain the reluctance of clinicians caring for older patients to have or document serious illness conversations: 1) aging in itself is not a serious illness; 2) geriatricians often focus on positive adaptation and social determinants of health and in this context, the label of "serious illness conversations" is perceived as limiting; and 3) because aging is not synonymous with illness, important goals-of-care conversations are not necessarily documented as serious illness conversations until an acute illness presents itself.
CONCLUSION: As institutions work to create system-wide processes for documenting conversations about patients' goals and values, the unique communication preferences of older patients and geriatricians should be specifically considered.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | e313-e317 |
Journal | Journal of Pain and Symptom Management |
Volume | 66 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2023 Sept |
Externally published | Yes |
Free keywords
- Humans
- Geriatricians
- Communication
- Aging
- Critical Illness/therapy