Ambivalent Wisdom as the Fruit of Reading

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

143 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It can be said that literary texts do not have any obligation to reality, and that literature destabilises our relations to the everyday use of words and to established perspectives. Literature stands in relation to something that cannot be explained or conceptualised, and in this respect it is close to religion. I argue that many of these characteristics of literature are also features of philosophical writing. I concurrently argue that literature is nonetheless connected to reality, and that it aims to say something about our world. I contend that philosophy can benefit from a deeper understanding of the close parallels and similarities between philosophical writing and literature.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-184
JournalLogoi.ph – Rivista di filosofia, Journal of Philosophy
Volume1
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Philosophy, Ethics and Religion

Free keywords

  • E. Løvlie
  • Literature
  • Religion
  • Philosophical Writing
  • Paul Ricoeur
  • D. Von der Fehr

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ambivalent Wisdom as the Fruit of Reading'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this