Abstract
Understanding how learning occurs, and what improves or impedes the learning process is of importance to academicians and practitioners; however, empirical research on validating learning curves is sparse. This paper contributes to this line of research by collecting and analyzing CAD (computer-aided design) procedural and cognitive performance data for novice trainees during 16-weeks of training. The declarative performance is measured by time, and the procedural performance by the number of features used to construct a design part. These data were analyzed using declarative or procedural performance separately as predictors (univariate), or a combination of declarative or procedural predictors (multivariate). Furthermore, a method to separate the declarative and procedural components from learning curve data is suggested. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1510-1518 |
Journal | Computers & Industrial Engineering |
Volume | 56 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Free keywords
- Learning curves
- Procedural knowledge
- CAD
- Declarative knowledge
- Empirical study
- training