Argument-inconsistency in charity appeals: Statistical information about the scope of the problem decrease helping toward a single identified victim but not helping toward many non-identified victims in a refugee crisis context

ARVID ERLANDSSON; Daniel Västfjäll; Paul Slovic; Oskar Sundfelt

doi:10.1016/j.joep.2016.06.007

Argument-inconsistency in charity appeals: Statistical information about the scope of the problem decrease helping toward a single identified victim but not helping toward many non-identified victims in a refugee crisis context

ARVID ERLANDSSON, Daniel Västfjäll, Paul Slovic, Oskar Sundfelt

Department of Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	126-140
Number of pages	15
Journal	Journal of Economic Psychology
Volume	56
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.06.007
Publication status	Published - 2016 Jun 30

Subject classification (UKÄ)

Psychology

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.joep.2016.06.007

Cite this

ERLANDSSON, ARVID., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., & Sundfelt, O. (2016). Argument-inconsistency in charity appeals: Statistical information about the scope of the problem decrease helping toward a single identified victim but not helping toward many non-identified victims in a refugee crisis context. Journal of Economic Psychology, 56, 126-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.06.007

@article{a923bc0c25154642a7fb3d150918a109,

title = "Argument-inconsistency in charity appeals: Statistical information about the scope of the problem decrease helping toward a single identified victim but not helping toward many non-identified victims in a refugee crisis context",

author = "ARVID ERLANDSSON and Daniel V{\"a}stfj{\"a}ll and Paul Slovic and Oskar Sundfelt",

year = "2016",

month = jun,

day = "30",

doi = "10.1016/j.joep.2016.06.007",

language = "English",

volume = "56",

pages = "126--140",

journal = "Journal of Economic Psychology",

issn = "0167-4870",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

ERLANDSSON, ARVID, Västfjäll, D, Slovic, P & Sundfelt, O 2016, 'Argument-inconsistency in charity appeals: Statistical information about the scope of the problem decrease helping toward a single identified victim but not helping toward many non-identified victims in a refugee crisis context', Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 56, pp. 126-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2016.06.007

Argument-inconsistency in charity appeals: Statistical information about the scope of the problem decrease helping toward a single identified victim but not helping toward many non-identified victims in a refugee crisis context. / ERLANDSSON, ARVID; Västfjäll, Daniel; Slovic, Paul et al.
In: Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 56, 30.06.2016, p. 126-140.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Argument-inconsistency in charity appeals: Statistical information about the scope of the problem decrease helping toward a single identified victim but not helping toward many non-identified victims in a refugee crisis context

AU - ERLANDSSON, ARVID

AU - Västfjäll, Daniel

AU - Slovic, Paul

AU - Sundfelt, Oskar

PY - 2016/6/30

Y1 - 2016/6/30

U2 - 10.1016/j.joep.2016.06.007

DO - 10.1016/j.joep.2016.06.007

M3 - Article

SN - 0167-4870

VL - 56

SP - 126

EP - 140

JO - Journal of Economic Psychology

JF - Journal of Economic Psychology

ER -

ERLANDSSON ARVID, Västfjäll D, Slovic P, Sundfelt O. Argument-inconsistency in charity appeals: Statistical information about the scope of the problem decrease helping toward a single identified victim but not helping toward many non-identified victims in a refugee crisis context. Journal of Economic Psychology. 2016 Jun 30;56:126-140. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2016.06.007