Assay discrepancy in mild haemophilia A

Elina Armstrong, Andreas Hillarp

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

UNLABELLED: There are three main methods used to assay factor VIII (FVIII) activity: the one-stage and two-stage clotting assays and the two-stage chromogenic method. The most commonly used assay for the diagnosis of haemophilia A is the automated one-stage FVIII assay. The classical two-stage FVIII assays are less frequently used. The chromogenic FVIII:C assay is a variant of the two-stage assay. It is easier to use and therefore used more commonly. Recently significant assay discrepancy has been recognised in the FVIII:C measurements in approximately one-third of mild haemophilia A patients. This so-called discrepant mild haemophilia A is characterised by a high ratio of one-stage/two-stage assay with one-stage FVIII levels that are typically more than double those of the two-stage coagulation assay. There are several mutations that destabilise the FVIIIa structure that can explain this result of a more pronounced decrease of the chromogenic FVIII:C activity compared with the one-stage activity. These mutations are clustered at the interfaces of the A1, A2 and A3 domains of the FVIII protein. The inverse discrepancy, where the one-stage assay gives lower FVIII:C results than the chromogenic assay, seems to be associated with mutations found close to important sites for thrombin cleavage or FIX binding. We are carrying out a study of mild haemophilia A samples from the Malmö Haemophilia Centre of families with a unique F8 genotype. The activity of FVIII will be measured using a chromogenic assay and two different one-stage assays. We hope to estimate the true size of assay discrepancy.

AIM: This project will review assay discrepancy in mild/moderate haemophilia A and the risk of misdiagnosis. The overall aim is to estimate the size of the problem and to learn from the literature and experiences from our centre as well as to suggest recommendations on how to avoid misdiagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)48-50
JournalEuropean Journal of Haematology. Supplementum
Volume93
Issue numbers76
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Aug

Bibliographical note

© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Hematology
  • Medicinal Chemistry

Free keywords

  • Blood Coagulation Tests/methods
  • Hemophilia A/blood
  • Humans
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Severity of Illness Index

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assay discrepancy in mild haemophilia A'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this