TY - JOUR
T1 - Baculovirus-driven protein expression in insect cells
T2 - A benchmarking study
AU - Stolt-Bergner, Peggy
AU - Benda, Christian
AU - Bergbrede, Tim
AU - Besir, Hüseyin
AU - Celie, Patrick H.N.
AU - Chang, Cindy
AU - Drechsel, David
AU - Fischer, Ariane
AU - Geerlof, Arie
AU - Giabbai, Barbara
AU - van den Heuvel, Joop
AU - Huber, Georg
AU - Knecht, Wolfgang
AU - Lehner, Anita
AU - Lemaitre, Regis
AU - Nordén, Kristina
AU - Pardee, Gwynn
AU - Racke, Ines
AU - Remans, Kim
AU - Sander, Astrid
AU - Scholz, Judith
AU - Stadnik, Magda
AU - Storici, Paola
AU - Weinbruch, Daniel
AU - Zaror, Isabel
AU - Lua, Linda H.L.
AU - Suppmann, Sabine
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Baculovirus-insect cell expression system has become one of the most widely used eukaryotic expression systems for heterologous protein production in many laboratories. The availability of robust insect cell lines, serum-free media, a range of vectors and commercially-packaged kits have supported the demand for maximizing the exploitation of the baculovirus-insect cell expression system. Naturally, this resulted in varied strategies adopted by different laboratories to optimize protein production. Most laboratories have preference in using either the E. coli transposition-based recombination bacmid technology (e.g. Bac-to-Bac®) or homologous recombination transfection within insect cells (e.g. flashBAC™). Limited data is presented in the literature to benchmark the protocols used for these baculovirus vectors to facilitate the selection of a system for optimal production of target proteins. Taking advantage of the Protein Production and Purification Partnership in Europe (P4EU) scientific network, a benchmarking initiative was designed to compare the diverse protocols established in thirteen individual laboratories. This benchmarking initiative compared the expression of four selected intracellular proteins (mouse Dicer-2, 204 kDa; human ABL1 wildtype, 126 kDa; human FMRP, 68 kDa; viral vNS1-H1, 76 kDa). Here, we present the expression and purification results on these proteins and highlight the significant differences in expression yields obtained using different commercially-packaged baculovirus vectors. The highest expression level for difficult-to-express intracellular protein candidates were observed with the EmBacY baculovirus vector system.
AB - Baculovirus-insect cell expression system has become one of the most widely used eukaryotic expression systems for heterologous protein production in many laboratories. The availability of robust insect cell lines, serum-free media, a range of vectors and commercially-packaged kits have supported the demand for maximizing the exploitation of the baculovirus-insect cell expression system. Naturally, this resulted in varied strategies adopted by different laboratories to optimize protein production. Most laboratories have preference in using either the E. coli transposition-based recombination bacmid technology (e.g. Bac-to-Bac®) or homologous recombination transfection within insect cells (e.g. flashBAC™). Limited data is presented in the literature to benchmark the protocols used for these baculovirus vectors to facilitate the selection of a system for optimal production of target proteins. Taking advantage of the Protein Production and Purification Partnership in Europe (P4EU) scientific network, a benchmarking initiative was designed to compare the diverse protocols established in thirteen individual laboratories. This benchmarking initiative compared the expression of four selected intracellular proteins (mouse Dicer-2, 204 kDa; human ABL1 wildtype, 126 kDa; human FMRP, 68 kDa; viral vNS1-H1, 76 kDa). Here, we present the expression and purification results on these proteins and highlight the significant differences in expression yields obtained using different commercially-packaged baculovirus vectors. The highest expression level for difficult-to-express intracellular protein candidates were observed with the EmBacY baculovirus vector system.
KW - Baculovirus-insect cell system
KW - Benchmark
U2 - 10.1016/j.jsb.2018.03.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jsb.2018.03.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 29545204
AN - SCOPUS:85044317706
VL - 203
SP - 71
EP - 80
JO - Journal of Structural Biology
JF - Journal of Structural Biology
SN - 1095-8657
IS - 2
ER -