Balancing stability and change in the New Weberian State

Louise Bringselius, Anna Thomasson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Attempts at modernization typically include change. We argue that, in a long term perspective, these change attempts tend to be balanced with reforms or measures aiming at stability. Many of the measures that are taken today, after years of New Public Management (NPM) reforms, aim at securing continuity and quality within the existing structures, meaning a public administration characterized by stability and continuity. This quest for stability serves as a cornerstone in the New Weberian State (NWS), connecting back to the classic bureaucratic values which have been more or less put aside during the past decades. In this article, we argue that stability is the new “modernity” in the public sector, thus pushing us away from the changes connected to the NPM ideas. This also includes a shift from output-related aspects to aspects concerning input and process. Three factors aiming to secure stability in public organisations are highlighted: Recruitment (input), standardization of work (formal process), and public sector values (informal process). These mechanisms are today increasingly being used to consolidate previous changes and achieve stability in the public administration.
Original languageEnglish
JournalStatsvetenskaplig tidskrift
Volume119
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Balancing stability and change in the New Weberian State'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift (Journal)

    Bergström, T. (Guest editor), Bringselius, L. (Guest editor), Lapsley, I. (Guest editor) & Thomasson, A. (Guest editor)

    2015 Sept 252017 Jan 31

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workJournal editor

Cite this