Projects per year
Abstract
We consider Bayesian inference for stochastic differential equation mixed effects
models (SDEMEMs) exemplifying tumour response to treatment and regrowth in mice. We produce an extensive study on how an SDEMEM can be fitted by using both exact inference based on pseudo-marginal Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and approximate inference via Bayesian synthetic likelihood (BSL). We investigate a two-compartments SDEMEM, corresponding to the fractions of tumour cells killed by and survived on a treatment. Case-study data
consider a tumour xenography study with two treatment groups and one control, each containing 5–8 mice. Results from the case-study and from simulations indicate that the SDEMEM can reproduce the observed growth patterns and that BSL is a robust tool for inference in SDEMEMs. Finally, we compare the fit of the SDEMEM with a similar ordinary differential equation
model. Because of small sample sizes, strong prior information is needed to identify all model parameters in the SDEMEM and it cannot be determined which of the two models is the better in terms of predicting tumour growth curves. In a simulation study we find that with a sample of 17 mice per group BSL can identify all model parameters and distinguish treatment groups.
models (SDEMEMs) exemplifying tumour response to treatment and regrowth in mice. We produce an extensive study on how an SDEMEM can be fitted by using both exact inference based on pseudo-marginal Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and approximate inference via Bayesian synthetic likelihood (BSL). We investigate a two-compartments SDEMEM, corresponding to the fractions of tumour cells killed by and survived on a treatment. Case-study data
consider a tumour xenography study with two treatment groups and one control, each containing 5–8 mice. Results from the case-study and from simulations indicate that the SDEMEM can reproduce the observed growth patterns and that BSL is a robust tool for inference in SDEMEMs. Finally, we compare the fit of the SDEMEM with a similar ordinary differential equation
model. Because of small sample sizes, strong prior information is needed to identify all model parameters in the SDEMEM and it cannot be determined which of the two models is the better in terms of predicting tumour growth curves. In a simulation study we find that with a sample of 17 mice per group BSL can identify all model parameters and distinguish treatment groups.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 887-913 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics |
Volume | 68 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 2019 Mar 24 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2019 Aug |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Probability Theory and Statistics
Free keywords
- Intractable likelihood
- Pseudo-marginal Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling
- Repeated measurements
- State space model
- Synthetic likelihood
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Bayesian inference for stochastic differential equation mixed effects models of a tumour xenography study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Active
-
Stochastic modelling of protein folding and likelihood-free statistical inference methods
Picchini, U., Forman, J., Lindorff-Larsen, K. & Wiqvist, S.
2015/01/01 → …
Project: Research