Born-Again Bibles: Biblical Studies after the “Death of the Author”

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In this chapter, I address the “containment” of meaning in relation to questions of authorship (or lack of authorship) in biblical studies. By revisiting Roland Barthes’ and Michel Foucault’s critiques of the author figure, I suggest that the implication for biblical studies is the opening of meaning-making beyond the figure of the author in his or her original context. Engaging with Brennan Breed’s study on the divide between exegesis and reception history, I argue that biblical reception history can more radically counter the “containments” and “closures” of writing that Barthes and Foucault criticize. I suggest that the inherent “veering” movement of the Bible – or rather, bibles – prompts a different approach to biblical studies. Biblical studies can function as a specifically outward-facing intellectual endeavor that takes into account ongoing meaning-making supplementary to and symbiotic with other academic disciplines.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBiblical Exegesis without Authorial Intension?
EditorsClarissa Breu
Place of PublicationLeiden
PublisherBrill
Pages94-107
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)978-90-04-37955-8
ISBN (Print)978-90-04-39581-7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameBiblical Interpretation Series
PublisherBrill
Volume172
ISSN (Print)0928-0731

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Religious Studies

Free keywords

  • Authorship
  • Barthes
  • Biblical Studies
  • biblical authorship
  • veering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Born-Again Bibles: Biblical Studies after the “Death of the Author”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this