Bridge over troubled water: Managing compatibility and conflict among thought collectives in sustainability science

Niko Soininen, Christopher Raymond, Hanna Tuomisto, Laura Ruotsalainen, Henrik Thorén, Andra-Ioana Horcea-Miclu, Milutin Stojanovic, Sanna Lehtinen, Rachel Mazac, Carlos Lamuela, Noora Korpelainen, Annukka Vainio, Reetta Toivanen, Timon McPhearson, Michiru Nagatsu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Sustainability transformations call forth new forms and systems of knowledge across society. However, few tools and processes exist for promoting dialogue among different interests and normative stances in knowledge co-creation. In this article, we build on the notion of thought collectives to argue that understanding and moderating normative tensions are necessary if sustainability science is to provide successful solutions. Drawing on an analysis of the normative tensions between rival high-tech and low-tech thought collectives in the mobility and food production sectors, we discuss three strategic approaches: applying common evaluative frameworks, building contextual convergence and embracing complexity. We argue that these strategies indicate a need to distinguish different kinds of reflexivity in managing tensions among thought collectives. As a practical conclusion, we establish sets of reflexive questions to help sustainability scientists deploy the knowledge management strategies discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-44
Number of pages18
JournalSustainability Science
Volume17
Issue number1
Early online date2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022 Jan 1

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Philosophy

Keywords

  • Thought collective
  • Sustainability science
  • Research management
  • Reflexivity
  • Mobility
  • Food production

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bridge over troubled water: Managing compatibility and conflict among thought collectives in sustainability science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this