“Brown Babies” in post-WWII Denmark: A Case Study of the Vulnerabilities of Adopted Children Born of War

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Children born to occupying soldiers during or after conflicts are in many ways an extraordinarily vulnerable population. These so-called children born of war (CBOW) commonly inherit the stigma of transgression and foreignness from their respective parents and face discrimination in post-conflict societies. Their specific vulnerabilities, though, emerge from multiple overlapping factors: the needs and social status of their family members, their relation to the trans/national communities of their parents as well as to ethno-national norms of belonging. This paper theorizes the multiple factors that shaped the vulnerabilities of biracial adoptees in post-WWII Denmark as Black and German children of fraternizing mothers. I look at a case from the Danish “child import,” the illegal adoptions of children born to African American soldiers and German women in late 1950s Denmark, in relation to the testimony of an adopted child born to a German soldier in Denmark during WWII. The similarities and differences between the two testimonies show that the “imported” biracial children did not just face specific racial vulnerabilities at this intersection between US American and Danish adoption histories but also a relational vulnerability tied to their CBOW status, which manifested through the slow violence of family secrecy practices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-129
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of the Austrian Association for American Studies
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • History
  • Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Anthropology, Demography and Criminology)
  • Social Anthropology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Brown Babies” in post-WWII Denmark: A Case Study of the Vulnerabilities of Adopted Children Born of War'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this