Abstract
CO2 management, capturing CO2 from industry processes or removing CO2 from the atmosphere, is increasingly presented as a necessity for climate. Scandinavian countries are at the forefront of developing carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. We reviewed the scientific literature on CCS in Scandinavia to identify and analyse prevalent imaginaries for the role of this technology in the region. Imaginaries capture ideas about the future use of technologies. They are deeply political in that they help define what futures are seen as possible and desirable.
Studying CCS imaginaries can grant insights into how current structures and interests shape future climate mitigation pathways. Our results show that one dominant imaginary defines the scientific debate, which envisions using CCS to preserve the industrial base of the region while seeking to meet climate goals. This dominant imaginary builds its appeal and legitimacy around three main characteristics: 1) scientific authority, which justifies the need for large-scale CCS, 2) greening the industrial regime, which gives it a specific purpose, and 3)
Scandinavian exceptionalism, which mobilises existing infrastructure and regional know-how combined with a narrative of national environmental leadership. We argue that the dominant imaginary limits the way in which the future can be imagined, by framing out remaining uncertainties and alternative ways of lowering emissions. This highlights the importance of open and critical democratic debate about suggested mitigation pathways.
Studying CCS imaginaries can grant insights into how current structures and interests shape future climate mitigation pathways. Our results show that one dominant imaginary defines the scientific debate, which envisions using CCS to preserve the industrial base of the region while seeking to meet climate goals. This dominant imaginary builds its appeal and legitimacy around three main characteristics: 1) scientific authority, which justifies the need for large-scale CCS, 2) greening the industrial regime, which gives it a specific purpose, and 3)
Scandinavian exceptionalism, which mobilises existing infrastructure and regional know-how combined with a narrative of national environmental leadership. We argue that the dominant imaginary limits the way in which the future can be imagined, by framing out remaining uncertainties and alternative ways of lowering emissions. This highlights the importance of open and critical democratic debate about suggested mitigation pathways.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Energy Research & Social Science |
| Volume | 113 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 May |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Political Science
- Environmental Management
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Burying problems? Imaginaries of carbon capture and storage in Scandinavia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.-
From Show Pony to Working Horse: Reimagining Carbon Capture and Storage for Just Climate Change Mitigation
Lefstad, L., 2026 Apr, Lund: Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies (LUCSUS). 119 p.Research output: Thesis › Doctoral Thesis (compilation)
Open AccessFile -
A Trojan horse for climate policy: Assessing carbon lock-ins through the Carbon Capture and Storage-Hydrogen-Nexus in Europe
Faber, L., Busch, H. & Lefstad, L., 2025, In: Energy Research & Social Science. 120, February 2025, 103881.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open Access
Projects
- 1 Active
-
Burying problems? Imaginaries of carbon capture and storage in Scandinavia
Busch, H. (PI), Carton, W. (CoPI), Lefstad, L. (Research student) & Allesson, J. (Research student)
2021/12/01 → 2027/01/31
Project: Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver