By convention or by nature: Melanchthon's criticism of late medieval Ockhamist political thought in the Commentarii in aliquot politicos libros Aristoteles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The article argues that existing scholarship has missed Melanchthon's central objective in writing the Commentarii in aliquot politicos libros Aristoteles. Rather than merely criticizing peasants and radical preachers, Melanchthon sought to refute the Ockhamist political thought of Gabriel Biel and John Mair. Using Aristotle's naturalism within the theological framework of the political order as ordained by God, Melanchthon criticized the conventionalist account of the Ockhamists, specifically the principles underlying the case for popular sovereignty or the power of the community over the ruler. Instead he put forward a theory of politics and constitutional monarchy grounded in natural law.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-28
Number of pages28
JournalHistory of Political Thought
Volume35
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • History
  • History of Ideas

Free keywords

  • Aristotle
  • Constitutionalism
  • Lutheran reformation
  • Monarchy
  • Natural law
  • Philipp Melanchthon
  • Popular sovereignty
  • Scholasticism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'By convention or by nature: Melanchthon's criticism of late medieval Ockhamist political thought in the Commentarii in aliquot politicos libros Aristoteles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this