Can reducing cosmetic substances help prevent chromate contact allergy?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Allergic contact dermatitis caused by Cr(VI) is often severe and difficult to treat. Therefore, primary prevention is a main goal but secondary prevention can be valuable to ease the symptoms or prevent relapse of Cr(VI) dermatitis when sensitization has occurred. Barrier creams have been tried for many chemical substances, but until now there is no successful barrier cream against Cr(VI). Objectives: To investigate the ability of reducing agents to transform Cr(VI) into Cr(III) in an experimental situation, in order to find suitable chemicals to investigate for possible use in a barrier cream. Methods: The capacity to reduce the amount of Cr(VI) was analyzed in water solutions of acetylcysteine, cysteine, dihydroxyacetone, glutathione, and iron sulfate heptahydrate. Thereafter the reducing capacity of acetylcysteine, dihydroxyacetone, glutathione, and iron sulfate on the amount of Cr(VI) in cement extracts was investigated. The content of Cr(VI) in the test solutions and in the cement extracts was estimated by the diphenyl carbazide spot test. Results: All of the chosen chemicals reduced the amount of Cr(VI) in the test solutions and in the cement extracts to some extent. The reducing capacity was most prominent for iron sulfate. Conclusion: A reducing capacity was found for all chosen chemicals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-44
JournalContact Dermatitis
Volume82
Issue number1
Early online date2019 Oct 25
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Dermatology and Venereal Diseases

Keywords

  • allergic contact dermatitis
  • barrier cream
  • chromate
  • Cr(VI)
  • hexavalent chromium
  • reducing chemicals

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can reducing cosmetic substances help prevent chromate contact allergy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this