Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation: a randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years.

Åke Carlsson, Anders Björkman, Jack Besjakov, Ingemar Önsten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

83 Citations (SciVal)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)362-369
JournalActa Orthopaedica
Volume76
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Bibliographical note

The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015.
The record was previously connected to the following departments: Orthopaedics (013242900), Reconstructive Surgery (013240300), Medical Radiology Unit (013241410)

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Orthopedics

Keywords

  • Knee: surgery
  • Porosity
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Reoperation
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Knee Prosthesis
  • Male
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Durapatite
  • Comparative Study
  • Biocompatible
  • Tibia: radiography
  • Tibia: surgery
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Knee
  • Bone Cements
  • Coated Materials
  • Replacement
  • Aged
  • Arthroplasty

Cite this