TY - JOUR
T1 - Certolizumab pegol, abatacept, tocilizumab or active conventional treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis
T2 - 48-week clinical and radiographic results of the investigator-initiated randomised controlled NORD-STAR trial
AU - Østergaard, Mikkel
AU - Van Vollenhoven, Ronald F.
AU - Rudin, Anna
AU - Hetland, Merete Lund
AU - Heiberg, Marte Schrumpf
AU - Nordström, Dan C.
AU - Nurmohamed, Michael T.
AU - Gudbjornsson, Bjorn
AU - Ørnbjerg, Lykke Midtbøll
AU - Bøyesen, Pernille
AU - Lend, Kristina
AU - Hørslev-Petersen, Kim
AU - Uhlig, Till
AU - Sokka, Tuulikki
AU - Grondal, Gerdur
AU - Krabbe, Simon
AU - Lindqvist, Joakim
AU - Gjertsson, Inger
AU - Glinatsi, Daniel
AU - Kapetanovic, Meliha Crnkic
AU - Aga, Anna Birgitte
AU - Faustini, Francesca
AU - Parmanne, Pinja
AU - Lorenzen, Tove
AU - Giovanni, Cagnotto
AU - Back, Johan
AU - Hendricks, Oliver
AU - Vedder, Daisy
AU - Rannio, Tuomas
AU - Grenholm, Emma
AU - Ljoså, Maud Kristine
AU - Brodin, Eli
AU - Lindegaard, Hanne
AU - Söderbergh, Annika
AU - Rizk, Milad
AU - Kastbom, Alf
AU - Larsson, Per
AU - Uhrenholt, Line
AU - Just, Søren Andreas
AU - Stevens, David J.
AU - Bay Laurbjerg, Trine
AU - Bakland, Gunnstein
AU - Olsen, Inge Christoffer
AU - Haavardsholm, Espen A.
AU - Lampa, Jon
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: The optimal first-line treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is debated. We compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of active conventional therapy with each of three biological treatments with different modes of action. Methods: Investigator-initiated, randomised, blinded-assessor study. Patients with treatment-naïve early RA with moderate-severe disease activity were randomised 1:1:1:1 to methotrexate combined with (1) active conventional therapy: oral prednisolone (tapered quickly, discontinued at week 36) or sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine and intra-articular glucocorticoid injections in swollen joints; (2) certolizumab pegol; (3) abatacept or (4) tocilizumab. Coprimary endpoints were week 48 Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission (CDAI ≤2.8) and change in radiographic van der Heijde-modified Sharp Score, estimated using logistic regression and analysis of covariance, adjusted for sex, anticitrullinated protein antibody status and country. Bonferroni's and Dunnet's procedures adjusted for multiple testing (significance level: 0.025). Results: Eight hundred and twelve patients were randomised. Adjusted CDAI remission rates at week 48 were: 59.3% (abatacept), 52.3% (certolizumab), 51.9% (tocilizumab) and 39.2% (active conventional therapy). Compared with active conventional therapy, CDAI remission rates were significantly higher for abatacept (adjusted difference +20.1%, p<0.001) and certolizumab (+13.1%, p=0.021), but not for tocilizumab (+12.7%, p=0.030). Key secondary clinical outcomes were consistently better in biological groups. Radiographic progression was low, without group differences. The proportions of patients with serious adverse events were abatacept, 8.3%; certolizumab, 12.4%; tocilizumab, 9.2%; and active conventional therapy, 10.7%. Conclusions: Compared with active conventional therapy, clinical remission rates were superior for abatacept and certolizumab pegol, but not for tocilizumab. Radiographic progression was low and similar between treatments. Trial registration number: NCT01491815.
AB - Background: The optimal first-line treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is debated. We compared clinical and radiographic outcomes of active conventional therapy with each of three biological treatments with different modes of action. Methods: Investigator-initiated, randomised, blinded-assessor study. Patients with treatment-naïve early RA with moderate-severe disease activity were randomised 1:1:1:1 to methotrexate combined with (1) active conventional therapy: oral prednisolone (tapered quickly, discontinued at week 36) or sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine and intra-articular glucocorticoid injections in swollen joints; (2) certolizumab pegol; (3) abatacept or (4) tocilizumab. Coprimary endpoints were week 48 Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) remission (CDAI ≤2.8) and change in radiographic van der Heijde-modified Sharp Score, estimated using logistic regression and analysis of covariance, adjusted for sex, anticitrullinated protein antibody status and country. Bonferroni's and Dunnet's procedures adjusted for multiple testing (significance level: 0.025). Results: Eight hundred and twelve patients were randomised. Adjusted CDAI remission rates at week 48 were: 59.3% (abatacept), 52.3% (certolizumab), 51.9% (tocilizumab) and 39.2% (active conventional therapy). Compared with active conventional therapy, CDAI remission rates were significantly higher for abatacept (adjusted difference +20.1%, p<0.001) and certolizumab (+13.1%, p=0.021), but not for tocilizumab (+12.7%, p=0.030). Key secondary clinical outcomes were consistently better in biological groups. Radiographic progression was low, without group differences. The proportions of patients with serious adverse events were abatacept, 8.3%; certolizumab, 12.4%; tocilizumab, 9.2%; and active conventional therapy, 10.7%. Conclusions: Compared with active conventional therapy, clinical remission rates were superior for abatacept and certolizumab pegol, but not for tocilizumab. Radiographic progression was low and similar between treatments. Trial registration number: NCT01491815.
KW - Abatacept
KW - Biological Therapy
KW - Certolizumab pegol
KW - Methotrexate
KW - Rheumatoid Arthritis
U2 - 10.1136/ard-2023-224116
DO - 10.1136/ard-2023-224116
M3 - Article
C2 - 37423647
AN - SCOPUS:85165210988
SN - 0003-4967
VL - 82
SP - 1286
EP - 1295
JO - Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
JF - Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
IS - 10
ER -