Ceteris Paribus in Conservative Epistemic Change

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis (monograph)

Abstract

This work contrasts conservative or minimally mutilating revisions of empirical theories as they are identified in the presently dominant AGM model of formal belief revision and the structuralist program for the reconstruction of empirical theories. The aim is to make understandable why both approaches only partly succeed in substantially informing and formally restraining the issue. With respect to the rationality of minimal change, the overall result is negative. Readers with an interest in formal epistemology are provided with application cases (mercury anomaly, revision of early thermo-dynamics, introduction of the neutrino), the historically inclined reader is offered a systematic perspective. The discussion can largely be followed without a background in formal logic.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor
Awarding Institution
  • Theoretical Philosophy
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Gähde, Ulrich, Supervisor, External person
Award date2007 Sep 7
Publisher
ISBN (Print)978-3-631-57283-2
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Defence details

Date: 2007-09-07
Time: 14:00
Place: Hamburg

External reviewer(s)

Name: Olsson, Erik
Title: Prof
Affiliation: University of Lund

---

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Philosophy

Keywords

  • minimal change
  • mercury anomaly
  • ceteris paribus laws
  • completeness assumptions
  • epistemic entrenchment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ceteris Paribus in Conservative Epistemic Change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this