Abstract
This chapter focuses on the direct taxation issues arising vis-à-vis charities. Many charitable organizations are active in the EU. Because of their important role in civil society, they are often granted a special status in national tax legislation. The charity itself is not always the direct or statutory beneficiary of the tax incentives. However, the idea behind these incentives is that indirectly, or economically, the charity benefits. Definitions and tax legislation applicable to charities vary widely. Traditionally, some charities, such as missionary work, health organizations and development organizations were always crossing borders. With ongoing globalization, other charities, such as arts organizations and universities also initiated activities abroad. Charities that did not confine themselves to the territory of their country of residence, came in the realm of EU law, for example, because of cross border investments, fundraising activities and competition with foreign charities.
In the past 15 years, European Union law and especially the fundamental freedoms included in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union have had a significant impact on charities. The impact could have been bigger if the Proposal for a Regulation on the Statute for a European Foundation (EF) had been adopted. In that case, a European legal form for charities would have been introduced. The Proposal obliged Member States to treat the EF, its donors and its beneficiaries equal to resident charities and to grant to them the same tax incentives. However, the Member States could not agree on this Proposal, even not after the tax provision was omitted, and it was withdrawn.
In the past 15 years, European Union law and especially the fundamental freedoms included in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union have had a significant impact on charities. The impact could have been bigger if the Proposal for a Regulation on the Statute for a European Foundation (EF) had been adopted. In that case, a European legal form for charities would have been introduced. The Proposal obliged Member States to treat the EF, its donors and its beneficiaries equal to resident charities and to grant to them the same tax incentives. However, the Member States could not agree on this Proposal, even not after the tax provision was omitted, and it was withdrawn.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Research Handbook on European Union Taxation Law |
| Editors | Christiana Panayi, Werner Haslehner, Edoardo Traversa |
| Publisher | Cheltenham, UK: Edgar Elgar |
| Chapter | 12 |
| Pages | 248 |
| Number of pages | 268 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781788110846 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781788110839 |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 Jan 17 |
Publication series
| Name | Research Handbooks in European Law |
|---|
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Law
Free keywords
- Tax law
- European Union Law
- Charities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Charitable organisations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Newspaper article
-
Maak belasting betalen met kunst transparant
Hemels, S., 2022 Jan 24, Het Financieele Dagblad, 226, 19, p. 25.Translated title of the contribution :Make paying taxes with art transparent Research output: Contribution to specialist publication or newspaper › Newspaper article
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver