Chunking or predicting: Frequency information and reduction in the perception of multi-word sequences

David Lorenz, David Tizon-Couto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Frequently used linguistic structures become entrenched in memory; this is often assumed to make their consecutive parts more predictable, as well as fuse them into a single unit (chunking). High frequency moreover leads to a propensity for phonetic reduction. We present a word recognition experiment which tests how frequency information (string frequency, transitional probability) interacts with reduction in speech perception. Detection of the element to is tested in V-to-Vinf sequences in English (e.g., need to Vinf), where to can undergo reduction (“needa”). Results show that reduction impedes recognition, but this can be mitigated by the predictability of the item. Recognition generally benefits from surface frequency, while a modest chunking effect is found in delayed responses to reduced forms of high-frequency items. Transitional probability shows a facilitating effect on reduced but not on full forms. Reduced forms also pose more difficulty when the phonological context obscures the onset of to. We conclude that listeners draw on frequency information in a predictive manner to cope with reduction. High-frequency structures are not inevitably perceived as chunks, but depend on cues in the phonetic form – reduction leads to perceptual prominence of the whole over the parts and thus promotes a holistic access.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)751-784
Number of pages34
JournalCognitive Linguistics
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jul 13
Externally publishedYes

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Specific Languages
  • General Language Studies and Linguistics

Free keywords

  • speech perception
  • phonetic reduction
  • chunking
  • frequency information
  • entrenchment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chunking or predicting: Frequency information and reduction in the perception of multi-word sequences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this