TY - BOOK
T1 - Co-production of Climate Services
T2 - A diversity of approaches and good practice from the ERA4CS projects (2017–2021)
AU - Ma;ñez Costa, Maria
AU - Oen, Amy M. P.
AU - Schmid Neset, Tina-Simone
AU - Celliers, Loius
AU - Suhari, Mirko
AU - Huang-Lachmann, Jo-Ting
AU - Pimentel, Rafael
AU - Blair, Berill
AU - Jeuring, Jelmer
AU - Rodriguez-Camino, Ernesto
AU - Photiadou, Christiana
AU - Jerez Columbie;, Yairen
AU - Gao, Chuansi
AU - Tudose, Nicu Constantin
AU - Cheval, Sorin
AU - Votsis, Athanasios
AU - West, Jennifer Joy
AU - Lee, Kaylin
AU - Shaffrey, Len
AU - Auer, Cornelia
AU - Hoff, Holger
AU - Menke, Inga
AU - Walton, Peter
AU - Schuck-Zöller, Susanne
N1 - This report is not externally peer-reviewedRevisions:2022-02-11 The report PDF was published 2022-05-06. An incorrect spelled author name was updated in the author list, and the published PDF has been exchanged. Before this date the PDF was downloaded 193 times.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This guide presents a joint effort of projects funded under the European Research Area for Climate Services (ERA4CS) (http://www.jpi-climate.eu/ERA4CS), a co- funded action initiated by JPI Climate with co-funding by the European Union (Grant 690462), 15 national public Research Funding Organisations (RFOs), and 30 Research Performing Organisations (RPOs) from 18 European countries. This guide sets out to increase the understanding of different pathways, methods, and approaches to improve knowledge co-production of climate services with users as a value-added activity of the ERA4CS Programme. Reflecting on the experiences of 16 of the 26 projects funded under ERA4CS, this guide aims to define and recommend good practices for transdisciplinary knowledge co-production of climate services to researchers, users, funding agencies, and private sector service providers. Drawing on responses from ERA4CS project teams to a questionnaire and interviews, this guide maps the diversity of methods for stakeholder identification, involvement, and engagement. It also conducts an analysis of methods, tools, and mechanisms for engagement as well as evaluation of co-production processes. This guide presents and discusses good practice examples based on the review of the ERA4CS projects, identifying enablers and barriers for key elements in climate service co-production processes. These were: namely (i) Forms of Engagement; (ii) Entry Points for Engagement; and, (iii) Intensity of Involvement. It further outlines key ingredients to enhance the quality of co-producing climate services with users and stakeholders. Based on the analysis of the lessons learned from ERA4CS projects, as well as a review of key concepts in the recent literature on climate service co-production, we provide a set of recommendations for researchers, users, funders and private sector providers of climate services.
AB - This guide presents a joint effort of projects funded under the European Research Area for Climate Services (ERA4CS) (http://www.jpi-climate.eu/ERA4CS), a co- funded action initiated by JPI Climate with co-funding by the European Union (Grant 690462), 15 national public Research Funding Organisations (RFOs), and 30 Research Performing Organisations (RPOs) from 18 European countries. This guide sets out to increase the understanding of different pathways, methods, and approaches to improve knowledge co-production of climate services with users as a value-added activity of the ERA4CS Programme. Reflecting on the experiences of 16 of the 26 projects funded under ERA4CS, this guide aims to define and recommend good practices for transdisciplinary knowledge co-production of climate services to researchers, users, funding agencies, and private sector service providers. Drawing on responses from ERA4CS project teams to a questionnaire and interviews, this guide maps the diversity of methods for stakeholder identification, involvement, and engagement. It also conducts an analysis of methods, tools, and mechanisms for engagement as well as evaluation of co-production processes. This guide presents and discusses good practice examples based on the review of the ERA4CS projects, identifying enablers and barriers for key elements in climate service co-production processes. These were: namely (i) Forms of Engagement; (ii) Entry Points for Engagement; and, (iii) Intensity of Involvement. It further outlines key ingredients to enhance the quality of co-producing climate services with users and stakeholders. Based on the analysis of the lessons learned from ERA4CS projects, as well as a review of key concepts in the recent literature on climate service co-production, we provide a set of recommendations for researchers, users, funders and private sector providers of climate services.
U2 - 10.3384/9789179291990
DO - 10.3384/9789179291990
M3 - Report
SN - 978-91-7929-199-0
T3 - CSPR Report (Centrum för klimatpolitisk forskning)
BT - Co-production of Climate Services
PB - Linköping University Electronic Press
ER -