Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Coalitions, Coordination and Electoral Choice: A Lab Experimental Study of Strategic Voting

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review

Abstract

When a voter chooses between large and small parties in a coalition, strategic reasons may be the tie-breaker. “Strategic voting” is often defined as a vote for another party than one’s most preferred one with the intention to affect the outcome of the election. The presence of coalitions can sometimes be argued to lead to less strategic voting, whereas others claim that coalitions create more strategic incentives. This chapter looks at how the relative strength of parties in a coalition affect voters’ tendency to vote strategically. Comparing two contexts with more or less uncertainty about which parties will make it to the parliament, the findings are that voters cast strategic votes for small parties to a greater extent when there are substantial size differences between the coalition parties. Individual expectations of parties’ likelihood of success are crucial to the decision making.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication Voting Experiments
Editors/authorsAndré Blais, Jean-François Laslier, Karine Van der Straeten
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages191-213
VolumePart III
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-319-40573-5
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-40571-1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coalitions, Coordination and Electoral Choice: A Lab Experimental Study of Strategic Voting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this