Abstract
In standard crystallographic refinement of biomacromolecules, the crystallographic raw data are supplemented by empirical restraints that ensure that the structure makes chemical sense. These restraints are typically accurate for amino acids and nucleic acids, but less so for cofactors, substrates, inhibitors, ligands and metal sites. In quantum refinement, this potential is replaced by more accurate quantum mechanical (QM) calculations. Several implementations have been presented, differing in the level of QM and whether it is used for the entire structure or only for a site of particular interest. It has been shown that the method can improve and correct errors in crystal structures and that it can be used to determine protonation and tautomeric states of various ligands and to decide what is really seen in the structure by refining different interpretations and using standard crystallographic and QM quality measures to decide which fits the structure best.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 18-26 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Current Opinion in Structural Biology |
Volume | 72 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2022 Feb |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Theoretical Chemistry
Free keywords
- ligand strain
- protonation state
- quantum refinement
- tautomeric state
- X-ray crystallography