Comparative evaluation of four bacteria-specific primer pairs for 16S rRNA gene surveys

Sofie Thijs, Michiel Op De Beeck, Bram Beckers, Sascha Truyens, Vincent Stevens, Jonathan D. Van Hamme, Nele Weyens, Jaco Vangronsveld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Bacterial taxonomic community analyses using PCR-amplification of the 16S rRNA gene and high-throughput sequencing has become a cornerstone in microbiology research. To reliably detect the members, or operational taxonomic units (OTUs), that make up bacterial communities, taxonomic surveys rely on the use of the most informative PCR primers to amplify the broad range of phylotypes present in up-to-date reference databases. However, primers specific for the domain Bacteria were often developed some time ago against database versions that are now out of date. Here we evaluated the performance of four bacterial primers for characterizing complex microbial communities in explosives contaminated and non-contaminated forest soil and by in silico evaluation against the current SILVA123 database. Primer pair 341f/785r produced the highest number of bacterial OTUs, phylogenetic richness, Shannon diversity, low non-specificity and most reproducible results, followed by 967f/1391r and 799f/1193r. Primer pair 68f/518r showed overall low coverage and a bias toward Alphaproteobacteria. In silico, primer pair 341f/785r showed the highest coverage of the domain Bacteria (96.1%) with no obvious bias toward the majority of bacterial species. This suggests the high utility of primer pair 341f/785r for soil and plant-associated bacterial microbiome studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number494
JournalFrontiers in Microbiology
Volume8
Issue numberMAR
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Mar 28

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Microbiology
  • Genetics and Genomics

Free keywords

  • 16S rRNA gene sequence primers
  • Explosives contamination
  • Microbial communities
  • Pyrosequencing
  • Soil

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative evaluation of four bacteria-specific primer pairs for 16S rRNA gene surveys'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this