Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Compensation after umbilical hernia repair: prosthesis and non-prosthesis claims

Martin Frimand Rønnow, Mattias Hoffner, Svend Schulze, Frederik Helgstrand, Claes Hjalmarsson, Thue Bisgaard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Based on solid evidence, mesh prosthesis reinforcement has reduced the risk of recurrence after umbilical hernia repair1–4, but less is known about the risk of complications or chronic pain4,5. Patients’ claims after surgery may represent a surrogate for poor outcome6. This study examined mesh prosthesis-related complications leading to economic compensation after elective umbilical hernia repair. Before the present study, it was hypothesized that prosthesis-related complications and chronic pain after elective umbilical hernia repair were important claim reasons leading to economic compensation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)408-410
Number of pages3
JournalThe British journal of surgery
Volume109
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Compensation after umbilical hernia repair: prosthesis and non-prosthesis claims'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this