Conflict between entrepreneurship and open science, and the transition of scientific norms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the trend of academic entrepreneurship, practical and direct contribution of university research to the society has been emphasized, in which university scientists have increasingly engaged in commercial activities, university-industry relationships, and technology transfers. However, this trend has aroused concern about a potentially negative impact on the tradition of open science. Drawing on a survey data of 698 Japanese natural scientists, this study analyzes the behaviors and norms of university scientists under the influence of university interventions for entrepreneurship, whereby examining the compatibility between entrepreneurship and open science. The results indicate that entrepreneurial interventions have facilitated scientists' norm for practical contribution, and consequently, their involvement in commercial activities and ties with industry. Then, some, but not all, of these entrepreneurial activities have deterred cooperative or open relationships between scientists. However, the results suggest that the entrepreneurial interventions have not deteriorated the traditional norm for open science. Further analyses indicate that the two norms for practical contribution and for open science are determined independently, implying that academic entrepreneurship can be promoted without deteriorating open science.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)508-531
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Technology Transfer
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Aug
Externally publishedYes

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Business Administration
  • Social Psychology

Free keywords

  • academic capitalism
  • commercialism
  • entrepreneurship
  • open science
  • scientific norm
  • I23
  • O38

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conflict between entrepreneurship and open science, and the transition of scientific norms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this