Contact Allergy to Textile Dyes - Clinical and Chemical Studies on Disperse Dyes

Kristina Morgardt-Ryberg

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis (compilation)

2022 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Disperse dyes are common sensitizers among textile dyes. Contact allergy to disperse dyes has been documented in studies carried out in southern Europe, however, corresponding studies have not been performed in the Scandinavian countries.

The aim of this study was thus to evaluate the prevalence of allergic reactions to a mix of textile dyes consisting of 8 disperse dyes: Disperse (D) Blue 35, 106 and 124, D Yellow 3, D Orange 1 and 3, and D Red 1 and 17, in southern Sweden, to assess the clinical association between self-reported skin problems and contact allergy to the mix, p-phenylenediamine and related rubber substances, and to ascertain whether patch testing with the dye mix was equivalent to testing with the separate ingredients at the concentrations used in the mix. Furthermore, the purity of the 8 disperse dyes used for patch testing at various dermatology departments and the significance of impurities in preparations of the dyes with regard to contact allergy were studied.

The frequency of contact allergy to the dye mix was 1.5%, which is comparable to the values reported in southern Europe. The most common dye allergen was D Orange 1, while the frequency of test reactions to D Blue 106 and D Blue 124 was lower than expected. The mix was found to be as good a detector of contact allergy to the disperse dyes as testing with any combination of the 8 ingredients tested at the concentrations used in the mix. Contact allergy to p-phenylenediamine was a better indicator of self-reported skin reactions to textiles than the textile dye mix used in this study. Thin-layer chromatography visualized impurities in all 107 investigated patch test preparations. No single reference substance could be identified for D Blue 35. For the other dyes, the mean concentration in preparations labelled 1.0% varied from 0.25%, for D Blue 124, to 0.68%,
for D Orange 3. D Orange 3 could not be demonstrated in 4 of 15 preparations labelled D Orange 3. About 25% of the 21 patients diagnosed as being allergic to D Blue 106 and D Blue 124 only reacted to impurities in the patch test preparations when tested with thin-layer chromatograms and a dilution series of commercial and purified D Blue 106 and D Blue 124.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor
Awarding Institution
  • Occupational and Environmental Dermatology
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Bruze, Magnus, Supervisor
  • Isaksson, Marléne, Supervisor
  • Gruvberger, Birgitta, Supervisor
Award date2009 May 8
Publisher
ISBN (Print)978-91-86253-27-1
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Bibliographical note

Defence details

Date: 2009-05-08
Time: 09:00
Place: CRC’s Aula, Universitetssjukhuset MAS, Malmö

External reviewer(s)

Name: Stenberg, Berndt
Title: Docent
Affiliation: Institutionen för folkhälsa och klinisk medicin, Enheten för dermatologi och venereologi, Umeå Universitet

---

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Dermatology and Venereal Diseases
  • Environmental Health and Occupational Health

Free keywords

  • Disperse Blue 106
  • contact allergy
  • Disperse Orange 3
  • disperse dyes
  • Disperse Blue 124
  • TLC
  • textile-related skin problems
  • textile dye mix
  • PPD
  • HPLC
  • impurities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contact Allergy to Textile Dyes - Clinical and Chemical Studies on Disperse Dyes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this