Projects per year
Abstract
In the Industry 4.0 era, time-sensitive and missioncritical control applications still have a long way to go, from being tied down and co-located with the systems they control, to taking full advantage of the cloud. Conservatively keeping applications local will deprive these complex applications of abundant
compute capacity, wider system integration, and the potential for collaborative control efforts. Feedback control systems are unlike other cloud applications - their performance and objectives can be formally defined, they require timely feedback, and they are sensitive to variations in system performance and noise.
Although resources are plentiful, the cloud is a noisy and latency prone execution environment, detrimental to feedback control system. In this paper, we evaluate a set of cloud platforms and infrastructures with the intention of hosting feedback control systems. In lower levels of the software stack, we observe differences between clouds. Further up in the stack we see the disadvantages of applying cloud native platforms. With an understanding of expected performance we proceed to evaluate a simple control strategy and show how the sensitive nature of control can cause a seemingly adequate cloud platform to pose a high risk, while a seemingly inadequate platform can positively affect the performance of our proposed controller.
compute capacity, wider system integration, and the potential for collaborative control efforts. Feedback control systems are unlike other cloud applications - their performance and objectives can be formally defined, they require timely feedback, and they are sensitive to variations in system performance and noise.
Although resources are plentiful, the cloud is a noisy and latency prone execution environment, detrimental to feedback control system. In this paper, we evaluate a set of cloud platforms and infrastructures with the intention of hosting feedback control systems. In lower levels of the software stack, we observe differences between clouds. Further up in the stack we see the disadvantages of applying cloud native platforms. With an understanding of expected performance we proceed to evaluate a simple control strategy and show how the sensitive nature of control can cause a seemingly adequate cloud platform to pose a high risk, while a seemingly inadequate platform can positively affect the performance of our proposed controller.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC) |
Publisher | IEEE - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. |
Publication status | Published - 2020 Dec |
Event | 13th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing, UCC 2020 - Leicester, United Kingdom Duration: 2020 Dec 7 → 2020 Dec 10 |
Conference
Conference | 13th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing, UCC 2020 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Leicester |
Period | 2020/12/07 → 2020/12/10 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Communication Systems
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Control-over-the-cloud: A performance study for cloud-native, critical control systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 3 Finished
-
E! Celtic-Plus 5G PERFECTA
Kihl, M. (PI), Fitzgerald, E. (Researcher) & Tärneberg, W. (Researcher)
Swedish Government Agency for Innovation Systems (Vinnova)
2018/08/27 → 2020/12/31
Project: Research
-
CotC: Control over the Cloud - Offloading, Elastic Computing, and Predictive Control
Skarin, P. (Researcher)
2016/08/01 → 2021/11/09
Project: Dissertation
-
WASP: Autonomous Cloud
Årzén, K.-E. (PI), Maggio, M. (Researcher), Eker, J. (Researcher), Berner, T. (Researcher), Skarin, P. (Researcher), Martins, A. (Researcher) & Millnert, V. (Researcher)
2016/01/01 → 2019/12/31
Project: Research