Conventional drainage versus four hour clamping drainage after total knee arthroplasty in severe osteoarthritis: a prospective, randomised trial

Justinas Stucinskas, Sarunas Tarasevicius, Algimantas Cebatorius, Otto Robertsson, Alfredas Smailys, Hans Wingstrand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Total knee replacement in severe osteoarthritis usually requires extensive soft tissue releases often associated with considerable bleeding. In a prospective, randomised trial we compared postoperative conventional suction drainage versus four hour clamping drainage in 60 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty for severe osteoarthritis. We compared blood loss, number of transfusions, postoperative complications and knee function and found significantly less postoperative blood loss through the drains (p < 0.001), and fewer blood transfusions (p=0.09) were needed in the clamped group. We conclude that clamping drainage after total knee arthroplasty in severe osteoarthritis reduces blood loss through the drains and the need for blood transfusions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1275-1278
JournalInternational Orthopaedics
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Orthopedics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conventional drainage versus four hour clamping drainage after total knee arthroplasty in severe osteoarthritis: a prospective, randomised trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this