Abstract
Through the influence of neoliberal ideas, many critical infrastructures that used to be under public ownership have been opened up for market competition. Using the Swedish railway system as a case, this paper empirically explores whether such reforms have given rise to common-pool resource problems, and discusses possible implications. The results show that institutional restructuring has created challenges related to balancing the use of the infrastructure with a sufficient level of maintenance. The paper concludes that the main value of analysing critical infrastructures from the perspective of common-pool resources is the possibility of juxtaposing the way organizational and institutional interactions across scales generate both short-term gains and long-term negative side effects influencing reliability and safety.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 282-292 |
| Journal | Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 2019 Feb 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Political Science (excluding Peace and Conflict Studies)
- Economic Geography
Free keywords
- common-pool resource
- critical infrastructure
- deregulation
- reliability
- safety
- tragedy of the commons
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Critical infrastructures and the tragedy of the commons dilemma: Implications from institutional restructuring on reliability and safety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver