Abstract
Project funding rarely demands much change on behalf of the recipient. In contrast, cross-sectoral mobility funding requires recipients to change their environment and often some aspects of their research. There is a need to understand the impact on the researchers’ experiences as knowledge producers within such programs, as part of the broader potential and significance of cross-sectoral mobility funding. This study draws on interviews with participants of the Swedish ‘Flexit’ program in order to develop a framework for assessing the dynamics and efficacy of such funding instruments. To do this, we develop a framework for understanding their cognitive effects; especially their ‘immersive’ potential, i.e., their ability to naturally involve the participant in their new setting. It proposes two dimensions along which such an assessment can take place: how the instrument challenges participants’ knowledge production practices, and the level of immersion that participants are subject to as part of the program.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 389-407 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Minerva |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 2020 Mar 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 Sept |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Free keywords
- Experience
- Funding instrument
- Immersive
- Impact
- Methodology
- Research funding
- SSH