Abstract
The effectiveness of public health measures to prevent COVID-19 contagion has required less vulnerable citizens to pay an individual cost in terms of personal liberty infringement to protect more vulnerable groups. However, the close relationship between scientific experts and politicians in providing information on COVID-19 measures makes it difficult to understand which communication source was more effective in increasing pro-social behaviour. Here, we present an online experiment performed in May 2020, during the first wave of the pandemic on 1131 adult residents in Lombardy, Italy, one of the world's hardest hit regions. Results showed that when scientific experts recommended anti-contagion measures, participants were more sensitive to pro-social motivations, unlike whenever these measures were recommended by politicians and scientific experts together. Our findings suggest the importance of trusted sources in public communication during a pandemic.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 201310 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Royal Society Open Science |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 Mar 10 |
Subject classification (UKÄ)
- Communication Studies
Free keywords
- COVID-19
- Italy
- Lombardy
- Experiment
- Compliance
- anti-contagion measures
