TY - JOUR
T1 - Data-center infrastructure and energy gentrification
T2 - perspectives from Sweden
AU - Libertson, Frans
AU - Velkova, Julia
AU - Palm, Jenny
PY - 2021/4/27
Y1 - 2021/4/27
N2 - Which societal functions should be prioritized when the electricity grid reaches its maximum capacity? By using Sweden as an example, this policy brief discusses the societal negotia- tions that arise around capacity deficits of the electricity grid. By introducing the term energy gentrification, we aim to highlight the potential dangers of failing to recognize that energy also constitutes a societal resource, and like any other resource of the built environ- ment, it is exposed to the risk of exploitation if left unprotected. We propose energy gentrifi- cation as an analytical perspective, through which negotiations and potential conflicts can be studied when grid owners must prioritize who should be connected to the grid. In rela- tion to previous research on gentrification, we identify several parallels to the Swedish case of data centers, such as the relative prioritization of global versus local capital, the competi- tion over resources, the allusion to promises of job opportunities and regional development for justification, and the tradeoffs between common goods versus private interests. The per- spective of energy gentrification offers a useful approach for inquiring into the ethical dimensions of energy policies and for highlighting the bureaucratic nature of energy policy decision-making. The policy brief concludes by proposing opportunities for future research.
AB - Which societal functions should be prioritized when the electricity grid reaches its maximum capacity? By using Sweden as an example, this policy brief discusses the societal negotia- tions that arise around capacity deficits of the electricity grid. By introducing the term energy gentrification, we aim to highlight the potential dangers of failing to recognize that energy also constitutes a societal resource, and like any other resource of the built environ- ment, it is exposed to the risk of exploitation if left unprotected. We propose energy gentrifi- cation as an analytical perspective, through which negotiations and potential conflicts can be studied when grid owners must prioritize who should be connected to the grid. In rela- tion to previous research on gentrification, we identify several parallels to the Swedish case of data centers, such as the relative prioritization of global versus local capital, the competi- tion over resources, the allusion to promises of job opportunities and regional development for justification, and the tradeoffs between common goods versus private interests. The per- spective of energy gentrification offers a useful approach for inquiring into the ethical dimensions of energy policies and for highlighting the bureaucratic nature of energy policy decision-making. The policy brief concludes by proposing opportunities for future research.
KW - energy gentrification
KW - electricity grid
KW - limited capacity
KW - data centers
KW - digital infrastructure
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85105144059
U2 - 10.1080/15487733.2021.1901428
DO - 10.1080/15487733.2021.1901428
M3 - Article
SN - 1548-7733
VL - 17
SP - 153
EP - 162
JO - Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy
JF - Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy
IS - 1
ER -