Defining Planktonic Protist Functional Groups on Mechanisms for Energy and Nutrient Acquisition: Incorporation of Diverse Mixotrophic Strategies.

Aditee Mitra, Kevin J Flynn, Urban Tillmann, John A Raven, David Caron, Diane K Stoecker, Fabrice Not, Per J Hansen, Gustaaf Hallegraeff, Robert Sanders, Susanne Wilken, George McManus, Mathew Johnson, Paraskevi Pitta, Selina Våge, Terje Berge, Albert Calbet, Frede Thingstad, Hae Jin Jeong, JoAnn BurkholderPatricia M Glibert, Edna Graneli, Veronica Lundgren

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    206 Citations (SciVal)

    Abstract

    Arranging organisms into functional groups aids ecological research by grouping organisms (irrespective of phylogenetic origin) that interact with environmental factors in similar ways. Planktonic protists traditionally have been split between photoautotrophic "phytoplankton" and phagotrophic "microzooplankton". However, there is a growing recognition of the importance of mixotrophy in euphotic aquatic systems, where many protists often combine photoautotrophic and phagotrophic modes of nutrition. Such organisms do not align with the traditional dichotomy of phytoplankton and microzooplankton. To reflect this understanding, we propose a new functional grouping of planktonic protists in an eco-physiological context: (i) phagoheterotrophs lacking phototrophic capacity, (ii) photoautotrophs lacking phagotrophic capacity, (iii) constitutive mixotrophs (CMs) as phagotrophs with an inherent capacity for phototrophy, and (iv) non-constitutive mixotrophs (NCMs) that acquire their phototrophic capacity by ingesting specific (SNCM) or general non-specific (GNCM) prey. For the first time, we incorporate these functional groups within a foodweb structure and show, using model outputs, that there is scope for significant changes in trophic dynamics depending on the protist functional type description. Accordingly, to better reflect the role of mixotrophy, we recommend that as important tools for explanatory and predictive research, aquatic food-web and biogeochemical models need to redefine the protist groups within their frameworks.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)106-120
    JournalProtist
    Volume167
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Subject classification (UKÄ)

    • Biological Systematics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Defining Planktonic Protist Functional Groups on Mechanisms for Energy and Nutrient Acquisition: Incorporation of Diverse Mixotrophic Strategies.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this