Degradation of 75 organic micropollutants in fresh human urine and water by UV advanced oxidation process

Natnael Demissie, Prithvi Simha, Foon Yin Lai, Lutz Ahrens, Dauren Mussabek, Adey Desta, Björn Vinnerås

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


In household wastewater, a large proportion of organic micropollutants (OMPs) load is attributed to human urine. OMPs could pose a risk to human and environmental health when urine collected in source-separating sanitation systems is recycled as crop fertiliser. This study evaluated degradation of 75 OMPs in human urine treated by a UV-based advanced oxidation process. Fresh urine and water samples were spiked with a broad range of OMPs and fed into a photoreactor equipped with a UV lamp (185 and 254 nm) that generated free radicals in situ. Degradation rate constant and the energy required to degrade 90% of all the OMPs in both matrices were determined. At a UV dose of 2060 J m-2, average ΣOMP degradation of 99% (±4%) in water and 55% (±36%) in fresh urine was achieved. The energy demand for removal of OMPs in water was <1500 J m-2, but for removal of OMPs in urine at least 10-fold more energy was needed. A combination of photolysis and photo-oxidation can explain the degradation of OMPs during UV treatment. Organic substances (e.g. urea, creatinine) likely inhibited degradation of OMPs in urine by competitively absorbing UV-light and scavenging free radicals. There was no reduction in the nitrogen content of urine during treatment. In summary, UV treatment can reduce the load of OMPs to urine recycling sanitation systems.

Original languageEnglish
Article number120221
JournalWater Research
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Water Treatment

Free keywords

  • Circular sanitation
  • Fertiliser
  • Nutrient recycling
  • Pharmaceuticals
  • Urine diversion
  • Wastewater treatment


Dive into the research topics of 'Degradation of 75 organic micropollutants in fresh human urine and water by UV advanced oxidation process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this