Denying Antecedents and Affirming Consequents: The State of the Art

David Godden, Frank Zenker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (SciVal)


Recent work on conditional reasoning argues that denying the antecedent [DA] and affirming the consequent [AC] are defeasible but cogent patterns of argument, either because they are effective, rational, albeit heuristic applications of Bayesian probability, or because they are licensed by the principle of total evidence. Against this, we show that on any prevailing interpretation of indicative conditionals the premises of DA and AC arguments do not license their conclusions without additional assumptions. The cogency of DA and AC inferences rather depends on contingent factors extrinsic to, and independent of, what is asserted by DA and AC arguments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-134
JournalInformal Logic
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Philosophy


  • affirming the consequent
  • Bayesian probability
  • conditional perfection
  • denying the antecedent
  • fallacy
  • heuristics
  • total evidence


Dive into the research topics of 'Denying Antecedents and Affirming Consequents: The State of the Art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this