Did Gender-Bias Matter in the Quantity-Quality Trade-off in 19th Century France?

Claude Diebolt, Tapas Mishra, Faustine Perrin

Research output: Working paper/PreprintWorking paper

177 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recent theoretical developments of growth models, especially on unified theories of growth, suggest that the child quantity-quality trade-off has been a central element of the transition from Malthusian stagnation to sustained growth. Using an original censusbased dataset, this paper explores the role of gender on the trade-off between education and fertility across 86 French counties during the nineteenth century, as an empirical extension of Diebolt-Perrin (2013). We first test the existence of the child quantity-quality
trade-off in 1851. Second, we explore the long-run effect of education on fertility from a gendered approach. Two important results emerge: (i) significant and negative association between education and fertility is found, and (ii) such a relationship is non-unique over the
distribution of education/fertility. While our results suggest the existence of a negative and significant effect of the female endowments in human capital on the fertility transition, the effects of negative endowment almost disappear at low level of fertility.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherDepartment of Economics, Lund University
Number of pages56
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Publication series

NameLund Papers in Economic History. Population Economics
No.141

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Economic History

Free keywords

  • Cliometrics
  • Education
  • Fertility
  • Demographic Transition
  • Unified growth theory
  • Nineteenth century France

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Did Gender-Bias Matter in the Quantity-Quality Trade-off in 19th Century France?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this