Differences in health related quality of life in the randomised ARTSCAN study; accelerated vs. conventional radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. A five year follow up.

Johanna Nyqvist, Per Fransson, Göran Laurell, Eva Hammerlid, Elisabeth Kjellén, Lars Franzén, Karin Söderström, Gun Wickart-Johansson, Signe Friesland, Helena Sjödin, Eva Brun, Anders Ask, Per Nilsson, Lars Ekberg, Thomas Björk-Eriksson, Jan Nyman, Britta Lödén, Freddi Lewin, Johan Reizenstein, Erik LundinBjörn Zackrisson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Health related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed in the randomised, prospective ARTSCAN study comparing conventional radiotherapy (CF) with accelerated radiotherapy (AF) for head and neck cancer.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)335-341
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume118
Issue number2
Early online date2016 Jan 6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging
  • Cancer and Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in health related quality of life in the randomised ARTSCAN study; accelerated vs. conventional radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. A five year follow up.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this