Discursive dynamics and lock-ins in socio-technical systems: an overview and a way forward

Machteld Catharina Simoens, Lea Fuenfschilling, Sina Leipold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Understanding the dynamics of stability and change is key to accelerate sustainability transitions. This paper aims to advance and inspire sustainability transition research on this matter by collecting insights from interpretative environmental discourse literature. We develop a heuristic that identifies and describes core discursive elements and dynamics in a socio-technical system. In doing so, we show how the interplay of meta-, institutionalized, and alternative discourses, dominant, marginal, and radical narratives, as well as weak and strong discursive agency influence the socio-technical configuration. The heuristic suggests three discursive lock-ins reinforcing the stabilization of socio-technical systems: unchallenged values and assumptions, incumbents’ discursive agency, and narrative co-optation. Furthermore, it explores three pathways of discursive change: disruptive, dynamic and cross-sectoral. Overall, this paper puts forward a discursive perspective on sustainability transitions. It offers additional analytical approaches and concepts for discursive transition studies, elaborated insights on the dynamics within and between the analytical dimensions of a socio-technical system, as well as a theoretical baseline for analyzing discursive lock-in mechanisms and pathways of discursive change.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1841-1853
JournalSustainability Science
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
  • Energy Systems

Free keywords

  • Agency
  • Discourse
  • Lock-in
  • Narrative
  • Sustainability transitions
  • Transformation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Discursive dynamics and lock-ins in socio-technical systems: an overview and a way forward'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this