Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Do Political Institutions Influence the Dismantling of Fossil Fuel Subsidies? Lessons from the OECD Countries and a Comparative Analysis of Canadian and German Production Subsidies

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Despite a global consensus that fossil fuel subsidies should be reformed, limited progress has been made. The study assesses whether domestic political institutions insulating politicians from backlash and compensating those affected by reforms make subsidies easier to dismantle. It was found that proportional representation and corporatism were correlated with lower levels of fossil fuel subsidies in OECD countries. A comparative case study of coal production subsidies in Germany and gas production subsidies in Canada suggests that political insulation and compensation contributed towards the dismantling of fossil fuel subsidies. The findings provide an understanding of the impact of corporatism and electoral systems on reform.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)367-382
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice
Volume26
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Political Science (excluding Peace and Conflict Studies)

Free keywords

  • comparative climate policy
  • corporatism
  • Fossil fuels
  • policy dismantling
  • proportional representation
  • subsidy reform

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do Political Institutions Influence the Dismantling of Fossil Fuel Subsidies? Lessons from the OECD Countries and a Comparative Analysis of Canadian and German Production Subsidies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this