Ductus venosus blood flow velocity waveform in diabetic pregnancies

Andrea Stuart, Isis Amer-Wåhlin, Saemundur Gudmundsson, Karel Marsal, Ann Thuring, Karin Källén

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective Maternal diabetes during pregnancy is associated with congenital cardiac malformations and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Blood flow in the ductus venosus (DV) has been postulated to reflect cardiac function. The aim of our study was to investigate if diabetic pregnancies exhibit abnormal DV hemodynamics, hence indicating changes in fetal cardiac function. Methods The pulsatility index of the DV (DV-PI) was analyzed retrospectively in 142 diabetic patients and compared to previously published DV-PI reference values from a non-diabetic low-risk population. DV values were then correlated with maternal glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Results DV-PI was significantly higher in pregnancies complicated by either pre-existing insulin-dependent (DM) or gestational diabetes when compared with normal reference values. Increased DV-PI values were still evident in both diabetic groups when neonates that were small-for-gestational age and neonates with pathological umbilical blood flow pattern were excluded from the analysis. In DM pregnancies a statistically significant correlation was found between DV-PI and maternal HbA1c. Conclusion Diabetic pregnancies exhibit increased DV-PI values when compared to a normal low-risk pregnant population, possibly indicating a fetal cardiac effect. Copyright (C) 2010 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)344-349
JournalUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Subject classification (UKÄ)

  • Radiology and Medical Imaging

Free keywords

  • pulsatility index
  • large-for-gestational age
  • diabetes
  • ductus venosus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ductus venosus blood flow velocity waveform in diabetic pregnancies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this